Monday 16 September 2019

Lucy Jones: Awkward Beauty, Attenborough Arts Centre, Leicester


until 06 Oct 19

Striking strokes and expressionistic colours, a red ectoplasmic self, coloured-in, a golden body, ageless, ageing, unexpected.

‘How did you get on this canvas?’

Backward mirror quotes, direct and intimate like the portraits, not cerebral like on many pop-art-inspired word paintings.

If there is a ‘condition’ it remains unnamed magnificently as everyone’s experience of life is their own and demanding its rightful, unbiased merit.

Then come the deceivingly simple landscapes, they come to take us momentarily outward from the emotional inner chamber occupied by the portraits and into a blazing sunshine.

But the gaze, her husband’s, her father’s, her sitters’, is imprinted, green, blue, yellow, present; defiant heads, defiant bodies, held high;

in a venue that is a gem, defiant itself and proud, filled with beautiful, joyful voices of kids, carers, visitors, art students, hi-brows; cause here, exactly here,
everyone is welcome.



more info:
www.visitleicester.info/whats-on/lucy-jones-awkward-beauty-p778451"
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/jun/21/lucy-jones-paintings-exhibitions-flowers-gallery

Tuesday 26 February 2019

MAGIC REALISM: ART IN WEIMAR GERMANY 1919-33, Tate Modern


until 14 Jul 19

Though not as rich and brutal as the Tate Liverpool exhibition last year, this is still a most interesting free exhibit of German interwar troublesome paintings accompanied by coherent contextually rich captions. Though, also preserved in a safe bottle of family viewing and political self righteousness. Images that would had been shaking are now by default accepted as ‘the right side of history’. Perhaps a comment on contemporary fascist narratives, contemporary wording and contemporary conflicts inter-state and intra-state might be interesting and fundamental in waking us up from our historical soporific view of the past.


We are still blind to the current shellshocked soldier, the current widow, the current prostitute out of destitution, the abducted raped bride, the 5p on the pavement that we never thought we’d bother pick up and now we excitedly do. We do not see the man following young mothers out of trams shouting ‘you are in England, you should speak fucking English’ as happened to my friend last week. Cause these are paintings safely pinned on walls and safely protected by their captions and preserved by time. You leave the exhibition upset, maybe; but definitely feeling you are not one of them. The ones from the past we spit on now. Not one of them. But no-one ever thinks they are.

more info:
https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/exhibition/magic-realism

Friday 22 February 2019

John Akomfrah: Mimesis: African Soldier, Imperial War Museum


until 31 Mar 19

Mesmerising as all his triptychs;

A direct, mystical comment on the participation and sacrifice of Commonwealth ‘subjects’ during European conflict. A sacrifice mostly forgotten.

The women in the film, the chorus, disapproving, knowing, abandoned, hurt, widows, mothers without sons, for which, as it is said, no known word exists in any language; all that, for a possibly superfluous cause.

Movements slow, if any. The soldiers are already dead, tired.

Tired.

In waiting.

They are in limbo. They are now all equal and all together.

Tired.

Dead.

Their costumes, outfits, uniforms, immaculate, as I guess you would be in the afterlife. Tired. Dead. Alone, though together, abysmally, alone.

Akomfrah, years now, has created a whole genre of itself. Recognisable, addictive, otherworldly yet skin close political.

The school girl next to me, came in with her class, made to do so, she had a giant swirling lollipop she was enjoying; I thought, do they still make those! Studiously she was involved with her swirling treat while slowly she started watching, the loud sounds she was making, getting all and more less frequent until she was hardly bothered with her treat because she was watching. I felt like smiling. I was so thrilled that this abstract, eternally slow to some, installation would absorb her.


Water. Water running over memories, over objects, a recurring theme in his work, we cannot be cleansed, we can not forget. Memory can be viewed under the haze of time, but a death is still a death. Thousands of deaths. For what?

The cost of a commonwealth person’s grave from the two world wars is C$85 per year. There are proper accounts and budgets for it and an organisation running it that started with decent, I guess, for the circumstances, intentions. And nice signs in the commonwealth cemeteries like the one in Wandsworth. Isn't that nice.

The video installation is, explicitly commenting on the death and absence war creates, especially for people that got involved by proxy. I thought that that was quite admirable of the Imperial War Museum to host this installation at its own accord.

Until I went to the museum’s shop out of curiosity. War itself, and its machines are celebrated more than what I expected, a take on human perseverance during war time. Products targeting kids, spitfires, machines of war. Churchill as a impeccable hero figure. Merchandise accordingly. A man that advocated and administered chemical weapons attacks, sold to kids as a funky merchandised cool guy. Spitfires. You can make your own. It also sells swirling lollipops. British. The IWM shop is trivialising war, trivialising pain, death and undermines the museums own effort to a reflective, modern stance. It is always under query what the museum’s objective is, even its own name still. But it is indisputable that the shop is unforgivably nationalistic, pro-war and insensitive in my view.

C$85, per grave.

Back in the video installation, suddenly, the soldiers, dead, step inside their own memories or limbos or heavens or hells or heads, inside rooms resembling art gallery rooms, in an extremely magnificent, inspired twist in the imagery. Reminding us also how safe we are, us, sitting in a gallery room watching this, from what is depicted in actual footage and current symbolic filming.

And the objects in those rooms and films become fetishised, in the sense of carriers of life and memory. The ghost visitor has no access to them, cannot touch them, cannot feel them. They are exhibits to his former self. A self that war destroyed irrevocably.

C$85

‘’I moored alone with this fable,
if it’s true that it is a fable,
if it’s true that mortals will not again take up
the old deceit of the gods;
if it’s true
that in future years some other Teucer,
or some Ajax or Priam or Hecuba,
or someone unknown and nameless who nevertheless saw
a Scamander overflow with corpses,
isn’t fated to hear
messengers coming to tell him
that so much suffering, so much life,
went into the abyss
all for an empty tunic, all for a Helen.’’

more info:
https://www.iwm.org.uk/events/mimesis-african-soldier
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/oct/01/john-akomfrah-purple-climate-change

An update 01/03/19: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/01/ex-head-of-british-army-backs-compensation-for-african-wwii-veterans

Wednesday 13 February 2019

Martin Eder: Parasites, Newport Street Gallery


until 17 Feb 19


Who the parasites are is unclear: is it the fluffy puppies and kittens that look threatening amid their surroundings, is it the naked bodies, the artist themselves, the gallery owner? Is it the teleological backgrounds that intercept other hyperrealistic representations of realities, occupied often by hybrid creatures?

Whoever they are, the results are disturbing and interesting.

Eder’s collage-worlds, seem to be the exact instances when, through a glitch, multiple worlds invade each other while the bodies present seem to just reflect the viewer’s fantasies, likes or fetishes. From teenage girls to older bodies, we find ourselves uncertain whether they are offensive, out of a sense of seeing over sexualised young bodies or the hyper-realistic techniques. Are those bodies emancipated or objectified? Are those offended by the younger naked bodies seeing them as semi-pornographic simply because of their own desires being triggered while seeing the older bodies as ‘sickly’ also reflects their immature experience of beauty?

These are paintings of undeniable mastery. The debate on the subject matter should not automatically negate the talent under discussions on morality. After all, maybe our sensibilities are more pronounced because the artist is still alive and the subjects still young, still old, still here. Sketches of even younger naked girls in more explicit postures were exhibited in the latest Klimt/ Schiele exhibition in the Royal Academy, yet hardly any visitors had a moral breakdown. Is it because Eder’s paintings are hyper-realistic or because Schiele, and his early teen prostitutes are long dead and buried, our moral responses masked by the safety of the past and the immortality of Schiele as a master?


A minimum of 1000 young women currently in the UK are reported to be subjected to Breast Ironing, a practise imposed on these young girls by their mothers and female relatives to delay the signs of puberty and in doing so hoping to avoid them being subjected to rape and unwanted male attention. The falseness of all these intentions and connotations is abysmal. When will finally the female teenage body be left alone by all adult preying eyes, a sexual or not being released from the over-sexualised fantasies of the grown-ups?

In this sense, I find Ender’s naked bodies of all ages more honest. They all feel as covered in a film of violence, they are more disturbing than seductive. In this play on classicism and technically perfect, these Parasites are earning their role to disturb rather than to shock in their ambiguity.

more info: https://www.newportstreetgallery.com/exhibition/martin-eder-parasites/
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/sep/25/damien-hirst-newport-gallery-callous-exercises-in-brutal-pornography-martin-eder-parasites-review
https://www.studiointernational.com/index.php/martin-eder-parasites-review-newport-street-gallery-london